Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add filters








Type of study
Language
Year range
1.
Indian J Ophthalmol ; 2015 July; 63(7): 582-585
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-170411

ABSTRACT

The methods of fundus examination include direct and indirect ophthalmoscopy and imaging with a fundus camera are an essential part of ophthalmic practice. The usage of unconventional equipment such as a hand‑held video camera, smartphone, and a nasal endoscope allows one to image the fundus with advantages and some disadvantages. The advantages of these instruments are the cost‑effectiveness, ultra portability and ability to obtain images in a remote setting and share the same electronically. These instruments, however, are unlikely to replace the fundus camera but then would always be an additional arsenal in an ophthalmologist’s armamentarium.

2.
Indian J Ophthalmol ; 2015 Feb; 63(2): 171
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-158550
3.
Indian J Ophthalmol ; 2014 Sept ; 62 (9): 960-962
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-155759

ABSTRACT

Fundus imaging with a fundus camera is an essential part of ophthalmic practice. A mobile phone with its in‑built camera and flash can be used to obtain fundus images of reasonable quality. The mobile phone can be used as an indirect ophthalmoscope when coupled with a condensing lens. It can be used as a direct ophthalmoscope after minimal modification, wherein the fundus can be viewed without an intervening lens in young patients with dilated pupils. Employing the ubiquitous mobile phone to obtain fundus images has the potential for mass screening, enables ophthalmologists without a fundus camera to document and share findings, is a tool for telemedicine and is rather inexpensive.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL